Back

Why Skipping Research in a Redesign Costs More Than Doing It

Discover why skipping UX research before a website redesign risks costly mistakes and poor results.
Rob Prescott

A website redesign can be a major investment in time, budget, and resources. Done well, it can improve usability, boost conversions, and better align your digital presence with your brand. Done poorly, without UX research, it becomes an expensive exercise in guesswork.

The most expensive redesign is the one you have to fix twice.

The danger of assumption-led redesigns

Many redesign projects are driven by opinion, internal taste, or competitor envy. Teams change navigation because they “don’t like it” or overhaul layouts because “it feels outdated.” Without evidence, these changes risk making the experience worse for the people who actually use the site.

Skipping research means you might remove a feature users rely on, bury important content, or introduce new friction points. Even a visually stunning site can fail if it’s harder to navigate, slower to load, or less intuitive.

CSR: the brief was one website

CSR’s website was built for shareholders. The brief was to make it better.

The analytics said otherwise. High bounce, low engagement. When we dug in, visitors didn’t know CSR’s brands were CSR. The people showing up were customers and trade, hunting products across Monier, Gyprock, PGH Bricks and Bradford, and the corporate framing was in their way.

So we didn’t rebuild the website. We built a network. The masterbrand became the way in to multi-brand answers, structured to move people between brands and support whole-of-room decisions. Shareholder content went somewhere it belonged. Every sub-brand got a universal navigation layer running alongside its own.

The brief was one website. The research said CSR isn’t a product house. It’s a brand network, and it needed building like one.

What UX research adds

UX research grounds redesign decisions in evidence. By combining usability testing, analytics review, and behavioural insight, you learn:

  • Which elements users find valuable.
  • Where friction or confusion occurs.
  • How changes might affect key metrics like conversion or retention.

It also uncovers opportunities you might not have considered, for example, simplifying a form to reduce drop-off or adjusting microcopy to clarify next steps.

De-risking the process

Research before and during a redesign helps you:

  • Prioritise changes that will have the biggest impact.
  • Avoid breaking parts of the site that already work well.
  • Test and refine ideas before full rollout.

This makes the launch smoother, reduces rework, and increases the chances of meeting your business objectives.

Evidence builds confidence

When design decisions are backed by user evidence, it’s easier to win stakeholder buy-in. It also helps set realistic expectations for timelines, budgets, and outcomes, reducing the risk of last-minute changes.

If you want your next website redesign to be a measurable improvement rather than an expensive gamble, Behavjōr can help you apply UX research to guide every stage.

Related: Behavioural research and strategy and Gyprock case study.

Prefer a shorter version?

Read our quick guide
Rob Prescott
Co-founder & Design Director
Rob Prescott is co-founder of Behavjōr, a behaviour-led design consultancy in Sydney. 25 years finding the opportunity a brief did not think to ask for.
TALK TO US

Ready to innovate?
Let’s make it happen

Contact Us